Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, getting a general score of 92.9 against 76.7. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should give you the same OS features. Even when Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Motorola Moto G9 Play were only released with a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better looking display than Moto G9 Play, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better camera than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a same size sensor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Motorola Moto G9 Play features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.