Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is better than Moto G9 Play, having a global score of 85.2 against 76.7. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F41 has a more recent 11 version and Moto G9 Play has Android 10. The Galaxy F41 construction is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G9 Play, although both were released only a couple months apart.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Moto G9 Play and Samsung Galaxy F41 have quite similar storage to install games and applications, both have equal internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy F41 features just a little better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy F41 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a way better resolution back camera and a way higher video quality.
Galaxy F41 features superior battery duration than Moto G9 Play, because it has a 20% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.