Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play, getting a 97.6 score against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is way thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, but it's way heavier and was released about 11 months before. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features.
Galaxy Fold features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Fold features a better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a quite bigger display, a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1536 x 2152px.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G9 Play has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G9 Play takes slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.