Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play, getting a 90.8 score against 76.7. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a bit thinner and a bit lighter phone than Motorola Moto G9 Play, even when they were released with only 0 months difference. The Galaxy Note 20 has a sharper screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a better pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play features a better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G9 Play shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G9 Play also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments, faster video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor.
The Moto G9 Play has greater battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.