Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play, getting a score of 98.9 against 76.7. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is a little heavier but thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a little bit larger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a much better screen pixel density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back, a lot better video quality and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Moto G9 Play features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.