Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's overall score of 76.7. Even though Galaxy Note 5 is incredibly older than Motorola Moto G9 Play, it's body is lighter and thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much higher screen pixel density. Moto G9 Play features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G9 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has more processing cores. The Moto G9 Play has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% more battery size.
The Moto G9 Play takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition, the Moto G9 Play also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos, a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.