Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Moto G9 Play's 76.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an older cellphone than Moto G9 Play, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a greater pixels density. Galaxy Note10 features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity. The Moto G9 Play captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G9 Play also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a way larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.