Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the Moto G9 Play, with a score of 86.2 against 76.7. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and Moto G9 Play were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version and Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger screen and a greater pixel amount per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same video definition, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a lot larger sensor and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Play features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.