Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a general score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note4 is an incredibly older phone than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, but it is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note4 has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a way greater pixel number per inch in the screen.
The Moto G9 Play features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Play has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, better 60 fps video frame rates, a way larger aperture to take better captures in low-light environments and a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G9 Play has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.