Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Moto G9 Play's 76.7 general score. Galaxy Note7's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Play, although it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a sharper screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot higher pixel count per display inch.
Moto G9 Play features a slightly better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G9 Play also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
Moto G9 Play features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Moto G9 Play captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, the Moto G9 Play also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.