Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-28 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Moto G9 Play, having an 88.3 score against 76.7. Even though the Galaxy S10 is older than Moto G9 Play, it's body is thinner and extremely lighter. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy S10 counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a way higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. Galaxy S10 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. Motorola Moto G9 Play captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with way more MP.
Moto G9 Play has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.