Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-28 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's global score of 76.7. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, giving you a couple additional features. Galaxy S10 5G's body is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, despite of the fact that it was released just a little over a year before.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a much better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto G9 Play has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto G9 Play also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Moto G9 Play features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.