Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is better than Moto G9 Play's global score of 76.7. The Galaxy S10e is an older device than the Moto G9 Play, but Samsung managed to make it noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Galaxy S10e has a bit better CPU than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a better display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px. The Moto G9 Play takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G9 Play also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S10e features a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Moto G9 Play counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.