Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is way better than the Moto G9 Play's 76.7 global score. Although Galaxy S20 and the Moto G9 Play were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy S20 is thinner and lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S20 features a much better display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a way greater screen density. Galaxy S20 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G9 Play, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto G9 Play features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size camera sensor and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Play also has a camera with much more mega-pixels, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.