Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's general score of 76.7. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S20 FE is a just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter phone than Motorola Moto G9 Play, even when both were released with only a couple of months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a better looking display than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater display pixels density and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G9 Play takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos, a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.