Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's score of 76.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Motorola Moto G9 Play were released with only 6 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is a little bit heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Play. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a lot greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G9 Play and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have incredibly similar battery durations. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality images and videos and a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.