Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, with a general score of 93.4 against 76.7. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Play. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 has a way better looking screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a much better display pixels density.
Galaxy S22 takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a higher resolution. The Moto G9 Play counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G9 Play features improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.