Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than Moto G9 Play's score of 76.7. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer and just a little bit thinner than Moto G9 Play's, but it is also heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a quite bigger display, a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a way better pixels density.
The Moto G9 Play has a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra and Moto G9 Play feature extremely similar battery performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos, a lot better video definition and a camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.