Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-28 | -- |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 76.7. The Galaxy S25 construction is a lot lighter and way thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Play. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S25 features a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and way more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
The Moto G9 Play has more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Play features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.