Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-28 | -- |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Moto G9 Play, getting a general score of 90.7 against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way thinner and incredibly lighter than the Moto G9 Play. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, giving you a lot of extra features.
Moto G9 Play counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G9 Play, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little bigger display and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as Moto G9 Play's battery life.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher video quality, a lot better 200 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.