Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Moto G9 Play's 76.7 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport body is extremely lighter and a little bit thinner than Moto G9 Play, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a way better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. Motorola Moto G9 Play features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G9 Play has a better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G9 Play also has better video frame rates, a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos, a way bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.