Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, having an 80.1 score against 76.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10. Although it's the best we compare here, it must be told that it is also a notably heavier and a lot thicker device.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot higher display density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better processor than Moto G9 Play. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Moto G9 Play, both of them have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and equal internal storage. The Motorola Moto G9 Play has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Motorola Moto G9 Play features a little better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.