Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's overall score of 76.7. Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G9 Play. These devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better CPU than Moto G9 Play. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Moto G9 Play has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same aperture, the Moto G9 Play also has a lot better 48 MP resolution back facing camera, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and higher video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's storage to install games and applications is just as good as Moto G9 Play's one, both of them have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Moto G9 Play features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.