Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 general score. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is a little bit lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, even when both of them were released only 7 months apart. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10, offering a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster CPU than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a much greater pixel density, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bit larger screen.
Moto G9 Play takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G9 Play also has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Moto G9 Play has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.