Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play, having a 92.3 score against 76.7. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a lot thinner and just a little bit lighter device than Motorola Moto G9 Play, although both of them were released only a couple months apart. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a sharper screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a much greater count of pixels per display inch, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bit bigger display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little faster processing unit than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G9 Play features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Moto G9 Play captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Moto G9 Play also has a way better resolution back camera, a much larger sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.