Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Moto G9 Play, with a 94.6 score against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is notably thinner but incredibly heavier than Moto G9 Play, and both were released with only 1 months difference. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a more vivid display than Moto G9 Play, because it has a larger display, more pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1768 x 2208 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a much more MP camera in the back.
The Moto G9 Play counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.