Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G9 Play is a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting a 76.7 score against 76.1. Motorola Moto G9 Play is a just a little heavier phone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G9 Play has older 10 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a greater display density, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger display.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a smaller sensor taking worse quality images, and they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G9 Play features a bit longer battery performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.