Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Moto G9 Play, having an 87.9 score against 76.7. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and the Moto G9 Play were released only a couple months apart, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is just a little bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better display than Moto G9 Play, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same sensor size, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Moto G9 Play has a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G9 Play has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.