Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-28 | -- |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than the Moto G9 Play, with a overall score of 86.1 against 76.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is a little heavier but a little bit thinner than the Moto G9 Play. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a more recent 11 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a brighter display than Moto G9 Play, because it has a little larger screen, a lot better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G9 Play has a better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Moto G9 Play, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.