Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Moto G9 Plus, having an 81.9 score against 80.5. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is older than the Moto G9 Plus, it's design is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Moto G9 Plus features much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G9 Plus features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.