Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, having an 87.1 score against 80.5. LG Velvet is a somewhat thinner and lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, even though they were released with only 4 months difference. LG Velvet has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG Velvet has a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG Velvet also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit higher screen density. The Moto G9 Plus takes slightly better videos and photos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G9 Plus also has a bigger sensor and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
LG Velvet counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.