Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G9 Plus has a score of 80.5, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. The Moto G9 Plus construction has the same thickness than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's just a little bit heavier. These phones have Android OS, but Moto G9 Plus has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery performance is very similar to Moto G9 Plus's battery performance. Moto G9 Plus has a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor, a way higher resolution back facing camera and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.