Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto G9 Plus's score of 80.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is incredibly thinner and much lighter than Moto G9 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more over a year before. Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and the same internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Moto G9 Plus has a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Moto G9 Plus counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.