Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-07 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than the Moto G9 Plus, with an 86.6 score against 80.5. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A50s body is much lighter and much thinner than Moto G9 Plus, although it was released about 11 months before. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50s and Motorola Moto G9 Plus count with extremely similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s features a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures.
The Moto G9 Plus has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.