Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 global score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, even when they were only released 4 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G9 Plus shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G9 Plus also has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures, a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
The Moto G9 Plus has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.