Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is better than Moto G9 Plus's global score of 80.5. Galaxy A52s's body is newer, lighter and thinner than Moto G9 Plus. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features.
Galaxy A52s has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bit higher pixel number in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a slightly bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Both of them have a same size aperture, the same video frame rates, a same resolution back-facing camera, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same (4K) video quality.
The Moto G9 Plus counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.