Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G9 Plus is slightly better than Galaxy A6, having a overall score of 80.5 against 75.8. The Moto G9 Plus is a noticeably newer phone than Galaxy A6, although it's much heavier and incredibly thicker. Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixel density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display. Motorola Moto G9 Plus takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photos and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Moto G9 Plus has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.