Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 general score. Despite of the fact Galaxy Fold is older and heavier than Moto G9 Plus, it's construction is still incredibly thinner. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a screen that's just as good as the Motorola Moto G9 Plus one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a just a little worse pixel count in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a quite larger screen.
The Moto G9 Plus has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Moto G9 Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.