Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than Moto G9 Plus, with a score of 90.8 against 80.5. Although Galaxy Note 20 and the Moto G9 Plus were released with only 1 months difference, Galaxy Note 20 is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
Moto G9 Plus features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G9 Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Moto G9 Plus features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Moto G9 Plus also has a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.