Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Moto G9 Plus, with a overall score of 81.2 against 80.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a lot older than the Moto G9 Plus, it's design is thinner and noticeably lighter. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Moto G9 Plus captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G9 Plus also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos, a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Moto G9 Plus counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Moto G9 Plus features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.