Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 overall score. The Galaxy Note10 Lite design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G9 Plus, although they were released with only 8 months difference. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a newer 11 version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little faster processor than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G9 Plus features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.