Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-07 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is better than the Moto G9 Plus's global score of 80.5. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S10 5G design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Moto G9 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Moto G9 Plus shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.