Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G9 Plus's score of 80.5. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design is noticeably lighter and thinner than Moto G9 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released around 18 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM. The Moto G9 Plus has a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as Moto G9 Plus's one, they have equal internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G9 Plus features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.