Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Moto G9 Plus, getting a 90.8 score against 80.5. The Galaxy S20 FE design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G9 Plus, although both of them were only released 1 months apart. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a little greater display density.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Moto G9 Plus features a little better battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.