Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than Moto G9 Plus's general score of 80.5. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features and a performance increase. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Moto G9 Plus were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better screen than Moto G9 Plus, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, more pixels per display inch and a little bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is very similar to Motorola Moto G9 Plus's battery duration. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher 108 MP resolution and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.