Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-07 | -- |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.88 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 general score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy S25 construction is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto G9 Plus.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher screen density.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus features a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G9 Plus counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a bit better camera than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.