Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G9 Plus is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, having a score of 80.5 against 77.8. Although Moto G9 Plus is incredibly newer than Galaxy S5 Sport, it's a little bit thicker and a lot heavier. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Moto G9 Plus has the older 10 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra GPU. Galaxy S5 Sport features a more vivid screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G9 Plus features a superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.