Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a score of 80.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Even though the Motorola Moto G9 Plus is somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's a little bit thinner and also extremely newer. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Moto G9 Plus counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Plus features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G9 Plus also has 4 more cpu cores.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus features better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.