Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus's score of 80.5. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is just a little thicker but a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features and increased performance.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel count per screen inch.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has more internal memory. Moto G9 Plus features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a much more MP back camera.
The Moto G9 Plus has superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.