Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, with a overall score of 88.5 against 80.5. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy Z Flip and the Motorola Moto G9 Plus were released only a few months apart, Galaxy Z Flip is lighter and a lot thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite better display pixels density.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G9 Plus features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.